Ji shu yu di guo yi yan jiu: riben zai Zhongguo de zhi min ke yan ji gou [Researches on Technology and Imperialism: Japanese Colonial Scientific Research Institutes in China]. Ri wei shi qi de zhi min di ke yan ji gou: li shi yu wen xian [Colonial Scientific Institutions during the Japanese Occupation and Puppet Manchukuo Period: History and Literature]. (Zhongguo jin xian dai ke xue ji shu shi yan jiu cong shu.by Bo Liang; Jianping Han; Xingsui Cao; Liwei (...) Wu. (shrink)

Chu tu wen xian yu ru dao guan xi " nei rong jian jie: ru dao guan xi shi yi xiang gui mo hong da de yan jiu ke ti, ta she ji daozheng ge Zhongguo si xiang shi de nei zai jie gou he fa zhan guo cheng, she ji dao Zhongguo wen hua jin hou de zou xiang, yi yi zhong da. Er shi shi ji yi hou, yi huo de le shu liang ke guan de yan jiu (...) cheng guo. Zui jin chu tu wen xian de da liang yong xian you wei zhe ge wen ti de tao lun ti gong le xu duo xin cai liao, xin shi ye, xin guian dian."Chu tu wen xian yu ru dao guan xi " shou ji le 30 duo pian you dai biao xing de lun wen, tong guo "Kong Lao Meng Zhuang zhi bian", "Ru dao hu bu yu ying xiang", "Chu tu wen xian xin shi ye" san ge ban kuai jia yi cheng xian, xi wang du zhe jie ci dui yi wang ru dao guan xi yan jiu de fa zhan mai luo yu kuang jia you zong ti de ba wo, bing you ci kai chu xin de yan jiu tian di. (shrink)

本书重点研析了社会主义宪政的若干基本理论问题。包括宪法与权力,宪法与人民主权原则,宪政的理论逻辑,宪政与法治,宪政与民主,宪政与政党,宪政与人权,宪政与社会主义法治理念等。全书坚持以马克思列宁主义为指 导,以求真务实的态度,综合运用法哲学、历史学、政治学等多种学科研究方法,对宪政问题的基本原理以及我国的宪政建设问题进行了深入剖析。作者通过研读辨析大量资料文献后,经过十余年时间的艰苦研究探索,比较全面 、深入、系统地辨析了若干对社会主义宪政的基础关系,兼有立论与驳论。本书比较深入地探析了人民主权原则在宪政理论中的地位,尤其是它与民主、自由、司法审查等的学理关系。从历史、社会、文化等角度探析民主、法治 、人权如何通过社会主义宪政建设得以价值与功能实现。如何通过发展社会主义民主、法治以及依法执政是探讨社会主义宪政建设可能性的必由之路。社会主义宪政是人类文明的积淀,是规范的政治,是现代文明的首要选择与根 本标志。作者还针对党中央提出的"树立社会主义法治理念"问题,结合其与社会主义宪政的关系进行了论述。.

本书主要分四个部分，分别为中国哲学社会科学“走出去”的战略意义、中国学者哲学社会科学研究的国际发表及其影响、中国哲学社会科学学术平台“走出去”现状与前景、中国哲学社会科学“走出去”的语言问题。.

英文题名:The foundations of modern social sciences.

本书主要介绍坚持马克思主义的哲学史观、董仲舒与黄老之学——儒学之创新、真理标准研究中应当重视的两个理论问题、论逻辑的本质及逻辑的方法、维特根斯坦的现象学之谜等内容。.

This book chapter/article discusses Ban Zhao's subtle and strategic negotiation of gender politics during the reign of the imperial and patriarchal Han dynasty (206 BCE - 220 CE). I argued that contrary to the received opinion, she is arguable the first woman philosopher in ancient China. Beyond her famed Lessons for Women, I explored (and translated) her less known but powerful official memoranda and poetry. They demonstrate Ban Zhao's exceptional bravery, intelligence, and literary achievement in advancing women's causes by her (...) writings and actions, as a woman public intellectual, amid immense social and political pressure in the first-century China. (shrink)

In Justice for People on the Move (2020), Gillian Brock argues that immigration bans targeting religions run afoul of international human rights agreements and practices concerning equal protection under the law, freedom of conscience, and freedom of religion. Religion-targeted bans are also said to violate ethical requirements for legitimacy by not treating immigration applicants fairly and signalling the acceptability of hatred and intolerance. Brock centres her discussion around the example of the Trump administration’s 2017 Muslim ban, for which she notes (...) additional problems such as the ban’s being motivated by dubious empirical assumptions about the risk of terrorism. I raise two challenges for Brock’s argument. I begin by asking whether banning the immigration of individuals from certain Muslim majority countries could be justified on the grounds that a large portion of the population in those countries appear to reject core liberal values such as the equal rights of women and homosexuals. This leads to my primary challenge, which concerns the practice of treating religion as a morally protected category such that discrimination based on religion is inherently impermissible. I argue that religions should be viewed as more akin to political ideologies than to morally arbitrary categories like race and sex, and that if a given religion is genuinely harmful to liberal values, an immigration ban could in principle be compatible with respect for human rights. (shrink)

Chuan bo Zhuzi jia li, xuan jiang Tai zu sheng yu, shi Ming chao zai di fang tui xing de zui zhu yao de liang zhong she hui li jiao xing shi, xian shi chu li zhi shi zhong shi wang chao zheng zhi de yi ge he xin li nian he shou dao te bie qiang diao de she hui zhi li fang shi. Jia li shi wang chao zheng zhi wen hua de yi bu fen, Ming chao wei (...) le tui guang jia li, jian li qi duo qu dao, duo ceng ji de jia li chuan bo: ji you guan fang chang dao ye you min jian zi wei, ji you li shu, li tu deng wen ben xing shi, yi you shi ren shi fan, zhi dao deng fei wen ben xing shi. (shrink)

Ben shu shou lu le zi 1500 nian yi lai, Zhongguo, Riben, Hanguo he Ou Mei di qu gong kai chu ban, fa biao de Yangming xue ji qi xiang guan xue shuo de wen xian mu lu, gong ji 5 wan yu tiao. Quan shu fen wei 10 juan. Qi zhong, di yi, er juan shou lu Zhong,Ri, Han san guo ji Ou Mei di qu yan jiu Yangming xue de zhong yao wen xian, bing an zhao yu yan (...) lei xing, fen wei Zhong wen wen xian, Ri wen wen xian, Han wen wen xian he Ying wen wen xian si ge bu fen; Di san zhi shi juan shou lu Zhongguo yan jiu Yangming xue de xiang guan wen xian, bing an nian du he xue ke fen lei cheng juan. (shrink)

This note is a friendly amendment to Marti's analysis of the failure of Føllesdal's argument that modal distinctions collapse in Carnap's logic S2. Føllesdal's argument turns on the treatment of descriptions. Marti considers how modal descriptions, which Carnap banned, might be handled; she adopts an approach which blocks Føllesdal's argument, but requires a separate treatment of non-modal descriptions. I point out that a more general treatment of descriptions in S2 is possible, and indeed is implicit in Marti's informal discussion, and (...) that this treatment also blocks Føllesdal's argument. Further, I show by a semantic argument that no revised version of Føllesdal's argument could establish a collapse of modal distinctions. (shrink)